Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The AI Architect's avatar

Interesting contrast in infrastrucure strategies. The nat gas dependecy for US AI centers vs China's renewable/nuclear mix underscores a deeper divergence in long-term planning. When you factor in methane leakage rates during extraction, the gap between coal and gas narrows quite a bit, curious to see if this shifts once turbine shortages hit.

João Carvalho's avatar

So, the only question I am left with is the “why?” of all of it.

Are Natural Gas projects less expensive or faster to deploy? Or are we just looking at a situation where China has a Macro plan for the deployment of datacenters and the US is only gathering an amalgam of individual projects with no centralised strategy behind it?

Same goes for the US coverage of the data centers, all of them being located on both coasts, that concentrate the highest population density, leaving the Midwest and West South Central empty - where land is cheaper and electric grid is less pressured by domestic consumption…

No posts

Ready for more?